Oversight arrives after the work.
Portfolio managers chase progress, exceptions and explanations across programs. By closure, the record is difficult to compare or verify.
Every funded program should leave a source-linked record of what happened, what changed, and what remains uncertain—while there is still time to act.
MapToc was created to reduce repeated reporting and preserve program knowledge through staff changes and grant closure.
In development
Spending connected to the events, decisions and delivery behind it.
Risks, exceptions and evidence gaps visible while teams can still respond.
Reported results linked to their sources, context and unanswered questions.
Set a shared minimum for recording significant decisions, changes and outcome evidence. Keep what is known—and what remains uncertain—available for review throughout delivery.
Governments and funders oversee many programs through changing teams and grant cycles. A common evidence record can help them spot exceptions, ask better questions and understand the reasons behind reported progress before a program closes.
Portfolio managers chase progress, exceptions and explanations across programs. By closure, the record is difficult to compare or verify.
Teams review and reuse the record as they work. Funders can follow spending and decisions, see open questions, and use the same history at closure.
When teams change or grants end, the reasons behind decisions should remain available. MapToc’s long-term vision is to carry reviewed lessons and unresolved questions into the next handover or funding decision.
Improve access to care.
ProposalMove outreach to Saturdays.
Decision noteAttendance needs follow-up.
Open outcome questionIncoming teams can follow earlier decisions and take up open questions.
Review delivery lessons and compatible evidence when shaping the next investment.
A result becomes more useful when its original source, significant decisions and unanswered questions stay together.
Spending in contextCosts linked to events and approvals.
Institutional memoryDecisions and adaptations kept over time.
Reviewable outcomesSources, contradictions and gaps stay visible.
The value to prove in pilots: less reconstruction and stronger continuity. Source-linking and AI alone are not unique.
White Paper · Capture and review mechanismSubscription access for organizations managing programs and portfolios, with configuration and onboarding support.
Mandated use is the intended expansion model. No institutional mandates are secured; pricing will be tested in paid pilots.
White Paper · SaaS model and adoptionSource capture, funding links and human review.
Permissions, integrations and data governance.
Test retrieval time, review effort and source accuracy.
Audit readiness depends on institutional requirements and complete underlying records. MapToc supports independent review.
White Paper · Vision and roadmap