MAPTOC / VISION

Know what is happening.
Act while it matters.

Every funded program should leave a source-linked record of what happened, what changed, and what remains uncertain—while there is still time to act.

MapToc was created to reduce repeated reporting and preserve program knowledge through staff changes and grant closure.

In development

MapToc’s vision

  1. Funding transparency.

    Spending connected to the events, decisions and delivery behind it.

  2. Programmatic integrity.

    Risks, exceptions and evidence gaps visible while teams can still respond.

  3. Explained outcomes.

    Reported results linked to their sources, context and unanswered questions.

See the program while there is still time to improve it.

Set a shared minimum for recording significant decisions, changes and outcome evidence. Keep what is known—and what remains uncertain—available for review throughout delivery.

  • Review material exceptions while decisions can still change.
  • Read spending alongside the events and approvals behind it.
  • Identify recurring risks and missing evidence across programs.
  • Keep decisions available through staff handovers and closure.
  • Reuse the same reviewed record for oversight and reporting.

Make oversight useful during delivery.

Governments and funders oversee many programs through changing teams and grant cycles. A common evidence record can help them spot exceptions, ask better questions and understand the reasons behind reported progress before a program closes.

FOR FUNDERS AND GOVERNMENTS
THE NEED

Oversight arrives after the work.

Late updatesUnlinked spendingMissing context

Portfolio managers chase progress, exceptions and explanations across programs. By closure, the record is difficult to compare or verify.

MapTocMap the OutcomeSOURCE LINKED
THE INSTITUTIONAL MODEL

One record that grows with the work.

Funding contextLive oversightOutcome evidence

Teams review and reuse the record as they work. Funders can follow spending and decisions, see open questions, and use the same history at closure.

White Paper · Why the record matters

A record that outlasts the grant.

When teams change or grants end, the reasons behind decisions should remain available. MapToc’s long-term vision is to carry reviewed lessons and unresolved questions into the next handover or funding decision.

PROGRAM MEMORY

Maternal health · Illustrative record

CONCEPT WORKFLOW
  1. AWARD

    Purpose agreed

    Improve access to care.

    Proposal
  2. IMPLEMENTATION

    Approach revised

    Move outreach to Saturdays.

    Decision note
  3. CLOSURE & FOLLOW-UP

    Learning retained

    Attendance needs follow-up.

    Open outcome question
THE RECORD CARRIES FORWARD
Original sourcesReview historyUnresolved questions
Illustrative workflow · A reviewed record preserves what is known and what still needs evidence.
01 / STAFF HANDOVER

Keep the reasoning with the work.

Incoming teams can follow earlier decisions and take up open questions.

02 / FUTURE FUNDING

Build on what programs learned.

Review delivery lessons and compatible evidence when shaping the next investment.

White Paper · Institutional memory and roles

Read the story behind a reported result.

A result becomes more useful when its original source, significant decisions and unanswered questions stay together.

01

Spending in contextCosts linked to events and approvals.

02

Institutional memoryDecisions and adaptations kept over time.

03

Reviewable outcomesSources, contradictions and gaps stay visible.

MapTocMap the OutcomeSAMPLE RECORD
OUTREACH TRANSPORT+$12,000Recorded cost increase · Expenditure summary
  1. EVENTFlooded roads. Route changed.Field incident note
  2. DECISIONExtra transport approved.Approval record
  3. DELIVERY18 outreach sessions completed.Field report
OUTCOME EVIDENCE GAPDid access to care improve?
Illustrative records · Connections explain context; outcomes still need evidence.

The value to prove in pilots: less reconstruction and stronger continuity. Source-linking and AI alone are not unique.

White Paper · Capture and review mechanism

Software as a service.
Built for program continuity.

Subscription access for organizations managing programs and portfolios, with configuration and onboarding support.

01Paid pilotProve reporting value
02Portfolio rolloutExpand validated workflows
03Grant requirementMake the record standard
PROPOSED SAAS MODEL
ORGANIZATIONPortfolio subscription
Program AEvidence record
Program BEvidence record
Program CEvidence record
Shared evidence standards · Program context preserved

Mandated use is the intended expansion model. No institutional mandates are secured; pricing will be tested in paid pilots.

White Paper · SaaS model and adoption

Build the foundation.
Prove it in real programs.

Talk to MapToc
01 / BUILD

Evidence engine

Source capture, funding links and human review.

02 / SECURE

Institutional access

Permissions, integrations and data governance.

03 / VALIDATE

Measurable value

Test retrieval time, review effort and source accuracy.

Audit readiness depends on institutional requirements and complete underlying records. MapToc supports independent review.

White Paper · Vision and roadmap